CELEBRITY
🚨 BREAKING: Jeanine Pirro moves to block George Soros from allegedly secretly bankrolling protests across America — by introducing a new proposal that could classify such funding as organized crime under the RICO Act. If enacted, Soros-linked accounts could reportedly be frozen overnight, triggering a massive political shockwave nationwide and igniting fierce debate over protest financing, free speech, and national security… Details in the comments 👇👇👇
🚨 BREAKING: Jeanine Pirro moves to block George Soros from allegedly secretly bankrolling protests across America — by introducing a new proposal that could classify such funding as organized crime under the RICO Act.
If enacted, Soros-linked accounts could reportedly be frozen overnight, triggering a massive political shockwave nationwide and igniting fierce debate over protest financing, free speech, and national security…
Details in the comments 👇👇👇
*Jeanine Pirro Floats RICO Proposal Targeting Alleged Protest Financing
Conservative commentator and former prosecutor Jeanine Pirro has ignited controversy after calling for a new legal approach that would target what she describes as covert funding of protests across the United States. In recent remarks, Pirro suggested that financial networks allegedly linked to billionaire philanthropist George Soros should be investigated under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, a statute traditionally used to combat organized crime.
Under the proposal Pirro has promoted, coordinated funding of protests—if proven to involve unlawful activity—could be classified as racketeering. Supporters argue this could allow federal authorities to freeze accounts connected to such operations, potentially overnight, and deter what they see as manipulation of civil unrest by wealthy political actors. They frame the idea as a national security measure aimed at restoring transparency and accountability.
Critics, however, warn that the proposal would face steep legal and constitutional hurdles. Civil liberties groups argue that applying RICO standards to protest financing risks infringing on First Amendment protections, including free speech and the right to assemble. Others note that Soros and organizations associated with him have long denied funding illegal activity, saying their support is directed toward lawful advocacy and civic engagement.
While no legislation has yet been formally introduced, Pirro’s comments have fueled a broader debate over who funds political protests, where the line lies between activism and criminal coordination, and how far the government should go in regulating political spending. If the idea were to gain traction in Congress, it would almost certainly spark an intense legal and political battle nationwide.
