BREAKING: A group of the top military lawyers in America, The Former JAGs Working Group, just called for an investigation of Pete Hegseth for war crimes, and MURDER. They are also encouraging ALL troops to…. Full Details

BREAKING: A group of the top military lawyers in America, The Former JAGs Working Group, just called for an investigation of Pete Hegseth for war crimes, and MURDER. They are also encouraging ALL troops to….

Full Details

A coalition of retired senior military legal officers — informally known as the *Former JAGs Working Group* — issued a public statement today calling for an independent federal investigation into media personality and former Army officer Pete Hegseth. The group claims that newly surfaced testimony and previously undisclosed operational records raise “serious legal concerns,” including potential violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) during his deployment.

In their statement, the retired Judge Advocate General officers stressed that they were not presuming guilt, but argued that the allegations were severe enough to require immediate scrutiny by the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice. The group described the matter as “an urgent test of the military’s commitment to accountability.”

While the working group did not release the documents they referenced, members said the material included witness accounts from former enlisted personnel and contractors. No charges have been filed, and no government agency has publicly acknowledged an investigation.

The statement also urged all active-duty service members and veterans to cooperate with any lawful inquiry:

> “If you have information relevant to these allegations, no matter how minor you believe it to be, you have a duty to report,” the group wrote. “Honoring the truth is part of honoring your service.”

Hegseth has not responded publicly to the claims in this fictional scenario.

Military law experts note that such public demands from former JAG officials are rare, underscoring the seriousness with which the group views the allegations — though they emphasize that only a formal investigation can determine whether any wrongdoing occurred.