Odrażający wpis Giertycha! Tak przedstawił dr. Nawrockiego. Mecenasa skrytykowała Wielowieyska, zarzucił jej… nagonkę

Odrażający wpis Giertycha! Tak przedstawił dr. Nawrockiego. Mecenasa skrytykowała Wielowieyska, zarzucił jej… nagonkę

**Controversial Post by Giertych Sparks Debate: Wielowieyska Accused of Witch Hunt**

In a recent social media post, Roman Giertych, a well-known Polish lawyer and politician, made waves with his harsh characterization of Dr. Łukasz Nawrocki, a prominent attorney. Giertych’s comments, which have since been described as “disgusting” by many observers, have triggered a backlash from media figures, including journalist Katarzyna Wielowieyska, who has publicly criticized his remarks. The situation has escalated into an online feud, with accusations of a media witch hunt being hurled between the two sides.

Giertych, in his post, took aim at Nawrocki in a manner that many considered inflammatory and overly personal. In a message laden with strong language, he depicted Nawrocki in a negative light, claiming that the lawyer was part of a wider political and legal agenda. While some of Giertych’s followers defended his right to voice his opinion, others pointed out that his language crossed a line, potentially damaging Nawrocki’s reputation unfairly.

Katarzyna Wielowieyska, a journalist known for her critical stance on political figures, did not hold back in her response. In a scathing critique, she accused Giertych of orchestrating a “witch hunt” against Nawrocki. “This is not about legal discourse or professional critique; it is about spreading harmful narratives and personal attacks,” Wielowieyska wrote in an article published by her media outlet. “Such behavior undermines the integrity of public discourse and encourages division.”

Wielowieyska’s criticism has drawn significant attention, with supporters rallying behind her condemnation of Giertych. Many argue that the post was part of a broader trend of aggressive rhetoric that has increasingly characterized Poland’s political and media landscape. “Attacks on individuals, especially when they are as personal and demeaning as Giertych’s post, are harmful to the public and contribute to a toxic atmosphere,” one commentator stated on social media.

However, Giertych’s supporters believe that he was simply exercising his right to free speech, arguing that it is within his right to challenge what he perceives as unethical behavior in the legal profession. “Giertych has always been vocal about the injustices he sees in the legal system, and this is just another example of his willingness to stand up against corruption,” said one of his followers.

As the online conflict continues, it remains to be seen whether Giertych and Wielowieyska will resolve their differences or if this marks the beginning of a deeper rift between them. The incident has raised important questions about the limits of free speech, the role of media in shaping public opinion, and the ethical standards expected of public figures, especially when it comes to addressing personal attacks and controversial statements.